Goal 2: Reduce Human Disease

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is “renewal” of R01 grants, competitive or not, justifiable?

Does NIH intend to develop a new milestone-based grant system and introduce accountability with regards to reaching solid metrics and useful, quantifiable research goals and milestones? Does NIH intend to introduce a truly non-conflicted and independent grant review system, similar to the review system and accountability of the FDA, to increase research efficiency? Should the public be informed annually how effective ...more »


-4 net votes
16 up votes
20 down votes

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Submitted by (@wjones7)

Making R01 funding work for the Medical Sciences

We need to spread R01 funding around more to ensure that the best science has funding adequate to move forward. To do this I believe changing how we think about R01 funding and expenditures can be used to put the NIH funds to better use. Too often successful researchers have the majority of their salaries on R01s and the institutions have little skin in the game. PI salaries can be a large part of the escalating budget ...more »


28 net votes
44 up votes
16 down votes

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Submitted by (@parise)

R01 funding

Unless we fix and increase the R01 funding rate, which most basic scientists depend upon, we will continue to lose outstanding scientists of all ages and not have the next generation of scientists or the numbers of currently outstanding scientists to answer any of these compelling questions and critical challenges. Related to this, much has been written about the significant failure rate of clinical trials in part due ...more »


420 net votes
435 up votes
15 down votes