Strategic Goal: Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Promotion of interdisciplinary and team science by T-32 Institutional Training Grants.

Are T32s doing a sufficient job of promoting interdisciplinary and team science? Should we change the way these programs are structured?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

T-32 programs train few thousands junior biomedical scientists every year. Training grants that succeed in integrating multiple discipline will produce a workforce that is more attuned to the needs of modern medicine and will be more competitive in the job market of the 21st century.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Activities along this line can be implemented immediately by strongly encouraging the institutions to revise or re-design their training programs.

Interdisciplinary training has become a necessity in the present time; there is a strong interest in today’s medicine at looking at the patient in its entirety and at disease processes from all angles. This requires data integration and scientists that are familiar with the language of different disciplines and can ask scientific and medical questions that span these disciplines.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

25 net votes
37 up votes
12 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

Addressing Health Inequities through Nontraditional Partnerships

What non-traditional partnerships can be leveraged to address health inequities?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

- Broaden reach to underserved populations

- Increase ability to generate evidence based solutions to address health inequities

- Bring expertise and resources to core partner (NIH)

- Enhance ability to identify unanticipated problems and strengthen efforts across all phases of the implementation research agenda

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Feasibility:

- Increased emphasis on health and health inequities by non-profit and particularly, for-profit organizations

- Affordable Care Act (ACA) includes both general and explicit provisions that could narrow the health disparities gaps through implementation research.

- Can leverage and build upon current research partnerships that exist between government agencies and health care delivery systems to address questions of major public health importance

- Opportune time to employ implementation research addressing health inequities through non-traditional research partnership with sectors such as education, state and local government, transportation (built environment), penal and re-entry systems (health risks and disparities), ministries of health, and for-profits, foundations, and non-profits with health care focus.

 

 

Challenges:

 

 

- Risk of disagreements and friction among partners and management with different priorities

 

- Synchronization of timing for decision making

 

- Achieving partners’ concurrence on decisions that provide the most cost effective solutions

 

- Time needed to establish trust among partners that do not routinely partner to address health inequities

 

- There are limited resources dedicated to fostering Public Private Partnerships

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

6 net votes
19 up votes
13 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

Implementation science research to reduce adverse effects of SCD

From various publications and reports, we have characterized the risks associated with sickle cell disease (SCD) and understand many of the barriers for treatment of SCD in LMICs. How can implementation science research be used to reduce the negative outcomes of SCD in low/middle income countries?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Reduction of deaths and negative outcomes associated with SCD and in LMICs

• Provide the evidence base that supports culturally relevant implementation strategies that reduce deaths associated with SCD in LIMCs

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Yes

, this is feasible

• Common goals and deliverables between NHLBI and partners will need to be identified

• Partnerships can be with international organizations, Ministries of Health and other partners

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

18 net votes
31 up votes
13 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Science communication skills of researchers

How do we add communication skills to our training programs to improve scientists’ communication with the public?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

Improving the ability of scientists to communicate the importance of their research will make science attractive to younger generations, increase collaborations and funding opportunities, and may increase general public support for research and researchers.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Tested models already exist in other countries. The public seems to be increasingly interested in reading press releases about discoveries in different areas, which now are regularly published in popular press (e.g., NYT)

Researchers rarely receive formal training for teaching, public speaking, and many lack even basic communication training. Learning how to better communicate science can help increase the attractiveness and impact of science by engaging colleagues, collaborators, attracting interest from potential future scientists, subjects for clinical studies, funding agencies, and the public in general. Being able to explain the research goals, scientific approach, and discoveries in clear and simple terms, makes science sound "cool" and can attract wide interest (for instance, think "CSI"). In other countries, science communication is part of the science graduate curriculum and their funding agencies require having a communication plan for the wide dissemination of findings of the research proposed (which is part of the application score!).

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

20 net votes
41 up votes
21 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

What is the optimal way to improve cardiac arrest resuscitation?

Sudden Death from cardiac arrest and gaps in knowledge of emergency cardiovascular care are the #1 killer of more than 400,000 Americans each year. This epidemic of death and disability is largely ignored and underfunded by NIH and all funding agencies and kills more than HIV, Cancer, Diabetes, and infectious diseases. There is no national registry of cardiac arrest, no mandatory reporting, and poor funding for both fundamental, ...more »

Submitted by (@nadkarni)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

Answering this question will save more lives and quality of life-years than all other infectious diseases in North America. The potential interventions are well developed and we need more fundamental, translational and implementation science to impact this most significant problem. An upcoming IOM report on needless deaths resulting from cardiac arrest is anticipated to be published in 2015.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Very feasible, just needs support and funding. A call to arms is being issued by the American Heart Association and Institute of Medicine. The roadmap is outlined, and all we need to do is follow the roadmap.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : Vinay Nadkarni MD

Voting

19 net votes
37 up votes
18 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

What are the most effective strategies for reducing alarm fatigue and optimizing cardiorespiratory monitor alarm management?

Hospital cardiorespiratory monitors have great potential to save lives, but are hampered by high false alarm rates that contribute to alarm fatigue. While the long term solution is developing new medical devices that will do this better, few hospitals will benefit from new device innovations in the next decade. In order to better identify early signs of cardiorespiratory deterioration in the hospital at an early stage ...more »

Submitted by (@chrisbonafide)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

Improved strategies for optimally detecting deterioration using existing bedside cardiorespiratory monitoring technologies has the potential to impact the care of hundreds of thousands of hospitalized adults and children each year.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

This is highly feasible with a fairly modest allocation of resources. This work falls under heart and lung disease, hospital medicine, nursing research, and implementation science.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : Chris Bonafide, MD, MSCE

Voting

-6 net votes
4 up votes
10 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

Culturally competent T4 research interventions to reduce heart, lung, blood, sleep

Using previous federal and partner infrastructure, what are the best methods to promote culturally competent T4 interventions that will reduce cardiopulmonary risk factors in global populations with a disproportionate burden of heart, lung, blood, sleep diseases?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

Reduction of cardiopulmonary risk factors

Reduction of health inequities

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Proven, evidence-based interventions exist for common diseases that can be adapted to reduce burden in low resource settings.

However,determining the best way to adapt existing interventions that are culturally competent and effective is a sensitive issue.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

-7 net votes
9 up votes
16 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

T4 Translation Research Informing Early Stage Translational Research

There is a need to utilize insights gained from T4 translation research and implementation science to inform the design and execution of early-stage translational research and clinical trials.

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Critical Challenge (CC)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Assure that early stage translation research will be suitable for implementation in real world setting

• Aligns the research interventions from T1-T3 research to those appropriate to T4 research

• Potential to focus early stage research in key high burden areas

• Provides research community an understanding of the connections from early stage to late stage translation research which will potentially refine research strategies and directions at all levels

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Promote the importance of translation to population of heart, lung, blood, and sleep researcher to broader research community

• Potential for more T4 research contributions for guiding investment into translation research from T1-T3

• Provide avenues for T1-T3 investigators to translate their ideas into positive outcomes for population health

• Successful T4 research will stimulate feedback loop and identify opportunities for early translation research

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

3 net votes
13 up votes
10 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 2: Reduce Human Disease

Behavior change labs: an interdisciplinary team approach

Will integration of behavior science in clinical research improve effectiveness of interventions for HLBS diseases associated with behavioral risk factors?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

Currently, there is no industry support for T1 (basic to clinical) behavioral research and therefore little incentive for basic and clinical behavioral scientists to work together to develop and test new, innovative strategies for changing HLBS-related behaviors based on basic behavioral science findings on motivation, perception, cognition and social relationships. Bringing together collaborative, interdisciplinary teams of basic behavioral scientists and clinically-oriented behavioral researchers could spur development and testing of innovative new approaches to difficult HLBS-related behavioral problems such as obesity, unhealthy diets, sedentary lifestyles, smoking and non-adherence to preventive and therapeutic HLBS regimens.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

New research in the behavioral sciences is elucidating the basic psychological, cognitive, social and behavioral processes underlying behavior and behavior change. Findings in this area could be developed into new strategies targeting problematic HLBS-related behaviors, but a mechanism for developing and testing novel ideas is needed. Networks designed to bring together basic and clinically-oriented behavioral researchers can enable better understanding of the bases of HLBS-related behaviors and accelerate the translation of findings into new approaches.

Adopting and maintaining healthy habits and lifestyles – such as eating healthy diets, engaging in regular physical activity, stopping smoking, and regularly taking prescribed medications – are crucial to heart, lung, blood and sleep (HLBS) health (Akesson et al, 2014; Mozaffarian, 2014). However, for most people, engaging in and maintaining a healthy lifestyle is challenging. Interventions designed to promote behavior change have had limited success, often influencing individuals over the short-term but failing to alter behaviors over longer periods of time, which is necessary to realizing the full benefits of a healthy lifestyle. Underlying the problematic behaviors associated with HLBS-related behavioral risk factors are fundamental psychological, motivational, cognitive and social processes that represent promising targets for the development of new, more effective behavioral interventions. For example, basic behavioral scientists are investigating the role of poor executive function in unhealthy eating behavior and exploring new ways to address the "self-control" failures that lead to impulsive eating.

 

However, unlike the biomedical arena where the translational pathway from basic science to clinical application is supported by both NIH and industry, there is no industry support and relatively little NIH funding devoted to T1 behavioral research -- i.e., research translating basic behavioral science findings into clinically significant behavioral interventions. As a result, basic behavioral science researchers have little incentive to collaborate with clinical researchers to develop and test novel behavioral treatments. Bringing together collaborative, interdisciplinary teams of basic behavioral scientists and clinically-oriented behavioral researchers could spur development and testing of innovative new approaches to difficult HLBS-related behavioral problems.

 

A compelling question is how to bring together these disparate researchers over a long enough time frame to enable them to identify, develop and testing new strategies for tackling resistant behavioral problems. One way to address this question is to fund a network of "behavior change labs," each of which brings together teams of basic behavioral scientists who are investigating the bases of behavior and behavior change with clinical researchers interested in designing, optimizing and testing novel ideas for tackling the difficult behavioral problems represented by obesity, unhealthy diets, sedentary lifestyles, smoking and non-adherence to medications used to prevent or treat HLBS diseases and disorders.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

83 net votes
129 up votes
46 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 2: Reduce Human Disease

Heart Failure Therapies

We need much more support for critical basic research to understand and develop transformative therapies for this enormous health care burden. This is not simply a question of epidemiology and large multicenter population data bases. We really need hard core science. It is impossible to know where the next breakthrough will come, and setting aside funds for hot button things - stem cells, or iPS, or gene editing per ...more »

Submitted by (@dkass0)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

NIH needs to stop trying to guess what the next big thing is and putting funds aside to support something that is popular at the moment. This has been done frankly with GWAS, with Stem cells, and perhaps ongoing now with "personalized medicine". All hot areas, but so are a ton of other things. IN my 30 years as a physician scientist, I cannot count on one hand the number of discoveries that were really transformative that came out of this type of ear-marked planning. Need more resources to support innovative individual scientists, particularly those with a track record of discovery, translation, and iinnovation We do not do that well enough at all.

Voting

6 net votes
18 up votes
12 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

Leveraging Networks of Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers

How best do we leverage the existing Federally Qualified Healthcare Center’s (FQHC) infrastructure to study T4 Implementation Research for heart, lung, blood, sleep diseases and conditions among high risk and vulnerable populations?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Develop strategies to reduced Health Inequities

• Potentially be scaled up across an entire health system with huge population impact

• Studies would be done in the environment and context where the findings with be implemented leading to better uptake and sustainability.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Formative FQHC groups are already being organized but do not have strong leadership and support

• FQHCs have ready access to the high risk and vulnerable populations that would benefit most from the research

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

-14 net votes
7 up votes
21 down votes
Active

Strategic Goal: Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

T4 Implementation Research Platform in Low Income Countries

What are the best strategies to stimulate development of a T4 Implementation Research network within low income countries (LICs)?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator1)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Currently there are huge implementation challenges within LIC contexts and only limited progress is being made to address the gaps

• Conducting research in the context where its finding will be scaled up will vastly increase its appropriateness, adoption and uptake, fidelity, and sustainability

• Small improvements in the challenging context of LICs should provide opportunities to make a large burden reduction

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Currently there are formative efforts to engage biomedical research in LICs with H3Africa, Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases, and others

• NHLBI Think Tanks and Workshops have found much interest and demand to T4 Implementation research engagement

• Key non-traditional partners (World Bank, USAID) are working on implementation strategies in LICs currently and will be strong partners

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

-22 net votes
7 up votes
29 down votes
Active