Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Enhancing T4 Implementation Research Expertise

We need to increase our base of T4 implementation research expertise among researchers, reviewers, and investigators.

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Critical Challenge (CC)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

Increase our base of expertise in a relatively new field. Increase the number of funded grants and projects that include T4 implementation research.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Additional training for T4 implementation research can be added to the training infrastructure currently in place at the NHLBI/NIH.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

-6 net votes
4 up votes
10 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

How will we train younger generation of scientists with skils in understanding the glycans?

Recent results suggests that glycans play critical roles in human physiology and pathology. Understanding glycan protein interactions may lead to next generation of drugs. But limited research is being funded on understanding structure - function relationships on glycans. Likewise, we are training very few researchers in the glycosciences. More programs are needed to impart glycoscience knowledge at the undergraduate, ...more »

Submitted by (@urdesai)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : Desai

Voting

-21 net votes
6 up votes
27 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Preparing for Transdisciplinary Research

There is a need to develop training programs, mentorship, and collaborations that cross boundaries and prepare researchers for future transdisciplinary needs.

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Critical Challenge (CC)

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

10 net votes
18 up votes
8 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

What Training Outcomes are Significant?

What trainee outcomes will best fulfill the mission of NHLBI, and what programs best promote these outcomes?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

A significant number of trainees do not become independent researchers but enter other career paths whose impact on the mission of NHLBI is unclear. A better understanding of the importance of these outcomes and the role of NHLBI-supported training in relation to our mission will inform the implementation and design of training strategies in the future.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

OER is rapidly implementing automated approaches to replace the manual tracking of trainees and their subsequent career paths. This effort should facilitate our ability to look specifically at NHLBI-supported programs.

 

 

Challenge: Obtaining and integrating outcome data that is not included in NIH databases or eRA Commons

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

-6 net votes
10 up votes
16 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Expanding short term Junior Faculty Training Programs such as the Summer Training Programs for Junior Faculty (PRIDE): More Pgms

Expanding the training efforts (e.g. greater number of funded summer programs, extend training beyond 2 summers, provision for 5-year grants so an additional cohort can be included) would be highly beneficial.

Submitted by (@treva0)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Critical Challenge (CC)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

Expand training efforts by increasing number of programs. The PRIDE is now turning away outstanding applicants due to the limited number of training slots across the different program. Since each program is currently training as many scholars as is feasible given their current infrastructure and resources, a solution may include increasing the number of independent programs in the PRIDE or number of trainees a given program can support. This will lead to increasing the number of independent researchers in the health-related fields who come from diverse backgrounds. Flexibility to increase the training period: Some junior faculty need more assistance than others. Some trainees from less research-intensive institutions may have had fewer opportunities to participate in research and thus have less experience and fewer (sometimes no) publications. They would greatly benefit from an initial period dedicated to increasing core research skills and publications prior to proposing and seeking independent grant funds. In the long run, they will be more likely to succeed given the extended training since the PRIDE offers opportunities to collaborate with nationally known researchers and provides access to data resources and the possibility of increasing their publication record. Also, a small percentage of the slots may be reserved for repeat participation in structured manner that provides escalating levels of support.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : Treva Rice for the PRIDE (Programs to increase diversity among individuals engaged in health-related research): Joe GN “Skip” Garcia, Francisco Moreno Girardin Jean-Louis, Gbenga Ogedegbe, DC Rao, Victor Davila-Roman, Mohamed Boutjdir, Betty Pace, Juan Gonzales, Bettina M Beech, Keith Norris, Marino Bruce, Alicia Fernandez, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, and Margaret Handley.

Voting

5 net votes
11 up votes
6 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Medical student research training in LMIC settings

What are the strategies for heart, lung, blood, sleep workforce to gain first-hand international experience in clinical research/implementation research training in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator1)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Among the students who earn medical degrees in the United States, very few of them have been sufficiently trained to address the health needs of the most vulnerable populations.

• An international exposure in an LMIC setting would have enormous impact on clinical practice and research

• Any medical student interested in broadening their training may have opportunities for clinical and non-clinical hands-on experience and in turn this would increase number of physicians and researchers in global health.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Feasibility: • The NHLBI has a wealth of experience in training and career development programs in general and has supported and worked with global centers of excellence in this area.

• This experience can be used to leverage international experience in clinical practice and research outcomes in LMIC settings.

 

Challenges: • NHLBI would have to develop additional training mechanism(s) to foster clinical practice and research in an LMIC area.

 

• Resources for this unique training may be a challenge.

 

• Helping patients from vulnerable populations would involve confronting cultural differences and language barriers.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

-30 net votes
5 up votes
35 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Training Mentors and Protégés to create a T4 translation pipeline

How can training of investigators (both mentors and trainees) be supported to create a T4 translation research pipeline?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

A robust global T4 translation research community would be developed that would help translate proven-effective interventions for use in populations for a positive health impact

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

The NHLBI Global Health and Health Inequities Think Tanks identified T4 translation research as an important area that needs development in the very near future.

 

However, conducting high quality T4 research requires a research community focused in this area. Currently, very few researchers are working in this area. The T4 research community needs to be identified so capacity can be established for conducting T4 research. Incentives would need to be developed to maintain a robust global T4 research community.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

-7 net votes
6 up votes
13 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Preparing a Diverse Biomedical Technology Development Workforce

How do we best develop a scientific workforce that is fluent in product development and commercialization issues? How can NHLBI best expand the training opportunities for early career scientists to prepare them for entry into the dynamic biomedical workforce landscape? There is a need for scientifically-trained experts from diverse backgrounds who also understand business needs relevant to biomedical technology development, ...more »

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

A well-trained biomedical technology development workforce would enhance the quantity and quality of research translated from the lab to the market focused on heart, lung, blood, sleep indications. A better understanding of the product development pathway would improve efficiency and resource usage, and accelerate the time for products to reach the market. Structured training would better prepare academic scientists for industry collaboration and provide an industry-ready scientific workforce. Ensuring these training opportunities are inclusive of scientists from different backgrounds would increase the diversity of the biomedical technology development workforce.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Industry is a large employer of research trainees, and trainees are becoming increasingly vocal about their interest in opportunities to be trained in areas beyond the academic lab that would prepare them for roles in industry. NHLBI can leverage recently launched educational opportunities, including the BEST (Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training), NCAI (NIH Centers for Accelerated Innovations), REACH (Research Evaluation And Commercialization Hubs), and CTSA (Clinical and Translational Science Awards) programs.

Transitioning scientific discoveries to inventions and products to benefit public health requires knowledge and education beyond what is traditionally learned during medical, graduate, and post-doctoral training.

 

Challenges to addressing this CQ include:

 

• Need for educators and mentors with relevant industry experience and expertise.

 

• This would be a culture shift in academic institutions, though the new NIH programs described above has already started to influence this shift.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

0 net votes
19 up votes
19 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

What should mentors report?

There is a need to establish markers that are predictive of future trainee success.

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Critical Challenge (CC)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

Instructions to Mentors for K Awards and Sponsors for F awards for reporting on the progress of their trainees in RPPR non-competitive renewal applications are very general. Developing more specific criteria and rankings should better predict future stars. Having more explicit training criteria throughout the life of a program could improve the overall quality of the mentoring and the training within the program.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Five to ten years is sufficient time to track a representative sample of programs to develop criteria to be tested.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

-7 net votes
6 up votes
13 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Implementation Research Workforce Addressing Health Inequities

What are the best strategies to develop a highly competent diverse Implementation Science research workforce to address health inequities?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Enhance fundamental knowledge about new and trans-disciplinary D&I field.

• Improve understanding on ways to scale-up and deliver proven interventions to address health inequities.

• New knowledge generation regarding important adaptations of interventions implemented in the local context.

• Improve health outcomes, particularly in underserved populations in both the U.S. and abroad.

• Successful D&I research training programs will help ensure a competent diverse D&I research workforce.

• Identification of the most effective career timing and combination (balance) of discipline-specific and trans-disciplinary courses essential to develop a cadre of trans-disciplinary implementation science researchers.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Feasibility:

• Dedicated NHLBI Center to promote, develop, implement, and disseminate research findings to address heart, lung, blood, sleep-related conditions and diseases.

• Identified new approaches to creating partnerships with trans-disciplinary research teams that expand beyond academia and increased understanding of the unique nature of mentorship needed for this discipline.

• Experience from several other ICs can be leveraged to improve or ability to be successful and decrease our launch time.

• Field is gaining momentum because of the realization of the unsustainable economic burden of health inequities (expected to increase in the future) in the U.S.

 

Challenges:

 

 

• Dedicated training mechanisms are needed to develop and meet our current/future T4 research workforce needs to address health inequities.

 

• Resources needed that provide unique training approaches (e.g., a trans-disciplinary scientific training environment, knowledge and experience with health disparity populations, unique training faculty (mentor) composition and opportunities to train mentees as future D&I mentors, innovative research tools and research experiences, and broad and diverse partnerships.

 

• Unique linkages with practice settings across disciplines needed.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

11 net votes
20 up votes
9 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Need to train and nurture more "translators"!

One of the major challenges in translating from bench-to-bedside and back is communication: the ability of basic and clinical scientists to understand each other's scientific language to be able to appreciate the importance of the other’s research questions and findings.

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator1)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Critical Challenge (CC)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

Having an increased number of researchers able to connect dots across the continuum of translational research should increase overall success of translation of ideas into health.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

This requires "rearranging" of already existing elements. Within 5-10 years of running specifically designed re/cross -training programs, the effects might be widely visible.

Basic scientists usually do not keep up with the latest outcomes of important clinical studies, and thus might miss important starting points for new basic research (e.g., negative trials that suggest the need for new hypotheses). The great majority of clinical scientists do not attend basic scientific sessions because are turned off by the specialized (dense/obscure) scientific terms used. Those who are interested in being translators have a hard time integrating and surviving in the "opposite camp" (i.e., at many medical schools, basic scientists are expected to bring in all their salary in a clinical department, and clinicians get little protected time for basic research)

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

22 net votes
39 up votes
17 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Bridge “translational gap”

Provide resources and training to improve the ability of scientists to bridge the “translational gap”. Continue and expand the VITA program.

Submitted by (@societyforvascularsurgery)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Critical Challenge (CC)

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : Society for Vascular Surgery

Voting

5 net votes
7 up votes
2 down votes
Active