Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Implementation Research Workforce Addressing Health Inequities

What are the best strategies to develop a highly competent diverse Implementation Science research workforce to address health inequities?

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

• Enhance fundamental knowledge about new and trans-disciplinary D&I field.

• Improve understanding on ways to scale-up and deliver proven interventions to address health inequities.

• New knowledge generation regarding important adaptations of interventions implemented in the local context.

• Improve health outcomes, particularly in underserved populations in both the U.S. and abroad.

• Successful D&I research training programs will help ensure a competent diverse D&I research workforce.

• Identification of the most effective career timing and combination (balance) of discipline-specific and trans-disciplinary courses essential to develop a cadre of trans-disciplinary implementation science researchers.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

Feasibility:

• Dedicated NHLBI Center to promote, develop, implement, and disseminate research findings to address heart, lung, blood, sleep-related conditions and diseases.

• Identified new approaches to creating partnerships with trans-disciplinary research teams that expand beyond academia and increased understanding of the unique nature of mentorship needed for this discipline.

• Experience from several other ICs can be leveraged to improve or ability to be successful and decrease our launch time.

• Field is gaining momentum because of the realization of the unsustainable economic burden of health inequities (expected to increase in the future) in the U.S.

 

Challenges:

 

 

• Dedicated training mechanisms are needed to develop and meet our current/future T4 research workforce needs to address health inequities.

 

• Resources needed that provide unique training approaches (e.g., a trans-disciplinary scientific training environment, knowledge and experience with health disparity populations, unique training faculty (mentor) composition and opportunities to train mentees as future D&I mentors, innovative research tools and research experiences, and broad and diverse partnerships.

 

• Unique linkages with practice settings across disciplines needed.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

11 net votes
20 up votes
9 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Need to train and nurture more "translators"!

One of the major challenges in translating from bench-to-bedside and back is communication: the ability of basic and clinical scientists to understand each other's scientific language to be able to appreciate the importance of the other’s research questions and findings.

Submitted by (@nhlbiforumadministrator1)

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? : Critical Challenge (CC)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC :

Having an increased number of researchers able to connect dots across the continuum of translational research should increase overall success of translation of ideas into health.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC :

This requires "rearranging" of already existing elements. Within 5-10 years of running specifically designed re/cross -training programs, the effects might be widely visible.

Basic scientists usually do not keep up with the latest outcomes of important clinical studies, and thus might miss important starting points for new basic research (e.g., negative trials that suggest the need for new hypotheses). The great majority of clinical scientists do not attend basic scientific sessions because are turned off by the specialized (dense/obscure) scientific terms used. Those who are interested in being translators have a hard time integrating and surviving in the "opposite camp" (i.e., at many medical schools, basic scientists are expected to bring in all their salary in a clinical department, and clinicians get little protected time for basic research)

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea : NHLBI Staff

Voting

22 net votes
39 up votes
17 down votes
Active