(@psaty0)

Goal 2: Reduce Human Disease

What types of questions are most likely to improve the health of the public? The importance of discovery science.

Congressional eagerness to see research funding translate into improvements in health care may make studies that address “how-to-deliver-care-questions” seem attractive. But the answers to “how–questions” are often so context dependent that the findings are neither generalizable nor durable. The answers to “how–questions” too often become obsolete when the health-care system, the electronic medical record, or the insurance ...more »

Voting

22 net votes
29 up votes
7 down votes
Active
(@dkass0)

Goal 2: Reduce Human Disease

Heart Failure Therapies

We need much more support for critical basic research to understand and develop transformative therapies for this enormous health care burden. This is not simply a question of epidemiology and large multicenter population data bases. We really need hard core science. It is impossible to know where the next breakthrough will come, and setting aside funds for hot button things - stem cells, or iPS, or gene editing per ...more »

Voting

6 net votes
18 up votes
12 down votes
Active
(@chrisbonafide)

Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

What are the most effective strategies for reducing alarm fatigue and optimizing cardiorespiratory monitor alarm management?

Hospital cardiorespiratory monitors have great potential to save lives, but are hampered by high false alarm rates that contribute to alarm fatigue. While the long term solution is developing new medical devices that will do this better, few hospitals will benefit from new device innovations in the next decade. In order to better identify early signs of cardiorespiratory deterioration in the hospital at an early stage ...more »

Voting

-6 net votes
4 up votes
10 down votes
Active
(@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

Culturally competent T4 research interventions to reduce heart, lung, blood, sleep

Using previous federal and partner infrastructure, what are the best methods to promote culturally competent T4 interventions that will reduce cardiopulmonary risk factors in global populations with a disproportionate burden of heart, lung, blood, sleep diseases?

Voting

-7 net votes
9 up votes
16 down votes
Active
(@nhlbiforumadministrator1)

Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

Expand the H3Africa Partnership Model to Decrease HLB diseases

Is there a way to decrease the risks for HLB disease leveraging the H3Africa genomics platform? • Leverage partnerships providing resources to the H3African populations • Identify the best collaborative partners to reach out to the low resource population • Find the best mechanism for collaborations to facilitate the interventions in low resource settings • Merge NHLBI research objectives and goals with those of potential ...more »

Voting

-6 net votes
6 up votes
12 down votes
Active
(@bmoore)

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Basic and Clinical Multi-disciplinary Partnerships to Understand Lung Disease

Basic scientists and clinicians have different training and bring different perspectives to lung disease research. Additionally, mechanisms that facilitate interactions of scientists from different fields may improve communication and facilitate novel ideas for lung disease research. I would like to see a funding mechanism that encouraged such partnerships in addressing fundamental disease questions and/or treatments. ...more »

Voting

3 net votes
11 up votes
8 down votes
Active
(@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Goal 3: Advance Translational Research

Implementation science research to reduce adverse effects of SCD

From various publications and reports, we have characterized the risks associated with sickle cell disease (SCD) and understand many of the barriers for treatment of SCD in LMICs. How can implementation science research be used to reduce the negative outcomes of SCD in low/middle income countries?

Voting

18 net votes
31 up votes
13 down votes
Active
(@wjones7)

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Making R01 funding work for the Medical Sciences

We need to spread R01 funding around more to ensure that the best science has funding adequate to move forward. To do this I believe changing how we think about R01 funding and expenditures can be used to put the NIH funds to better use. Too often successful researchers have the majority of their salaries on R01s and the institutions have little skin in the game. PI salaries can be a large part of the escalating budget ...more »

Voting

28 net votes
44 up votes
16 down votes
Active
(@nhlbiforumadministrator)

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Improving Biomedical Careers

There is a critical challenge to retain highly trained basic and clinical scientists in the biomedical research enterprise and expediently promote their independence and capacity to produce innovative discoveries. There is a need to provide more funding opportunities for collaborative, team-science approaches to scientific investigation by interdisciplinary teams comprised of clinician scientists, basic researchers, and ...more »

Voting

32 net votes
50 up votes
18 down votes
Active