Goal 2: Reduce Human Disease

what are the molecular pheontypic differences in IPF/ILD

What are the molecular phenotypic differences in blood and tissue of IPF ILD and how do they relate to disease course and potential response to therapy. There is a need to gain understanding in humans of the differences and similarities in iPF and iLD in general to eliminate the idiopathic nature and establish human targets. The challenge is coupling such research to longer term studies/outcomes and potentially clinical trials.

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC

Establishing molecular definitions for this idiopathic disease would a) provide greater clarity and definition to a what is otherwise a syndrome b) establish targets for intervention both for IPF and ILD in general c) refocus translational efforts on human setting for this purely human disease d) establish molecular relationships between IPF and outcomes e) establish intermediate biomarkers for more rapid evaluation for treatment development f) allow potential crossover development with acute lung injury fibrosis g) establish molecular relationships for crossover with human immunology studies and other autoimmune diseases with fibrotic tissue development (CAD, Glomerulonephritis, etc).

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC

Challenges surround lack of a larger more comprehensive and integrative approach to studying human disease. In an uncommon disease such as IPF, mutlicenter patient enrollment and biologics acquisition must occur in conjunction with both long term longitudinal outcomes and the influence of both new standard of care therapies and novel clinical trials. The scope of studies must be larger, more pragmatic and longer than previously designed NIH clinical studies to allow for integration of translational research. The challenge surrounds failure to allow these elements to coexist. The potential very large for true ILD program with a vision for a long term integrative plan with vision rather than just individual RO1 efforts. An example would an overriding longitudinal study in which patients could enroll and participate in other projects/studies/treatment but where the patient is never lost to follow up. This as cornerstone would then allow other programatic efforts to coexist.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea Imre Noth



0 net votes
3 up votes
3 down votes
Idea No. 950