Showing 2 ideas for tag "skills"

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Expanding short term Junior Faculty Training Programs such as the Summer Training Programs for Junior Faculty (PRIDE): More Pgms

Expanding the training efforts (e.g. greater number of funded summer programs, extend training beyond 2 summers, provision for 5-year grants so an additional cohort can be included) would be highly beneficial.

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? Critical Challenge (CC)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC

Expand training efforts by increasing number of programs. The PRIDE is now turning away outstanding applicants due to the limited number of training slots across the different program. Since each program is currently training as many scholars as is feasible given their current infrastructure and resources, a solution may include increasing the number of independent programs in the PRIDE or number of trainees a given program can support. This will lead to increasing the number of independent researchers in the health-related fields who come from diverse backgrounds. Flexibility to increase the training period: Some junior faculty need more assistance than others. Some trainees from less research-intensive institutions may have had fewer opportunities to participate in research and thus have less experience and fewer (sometimes no) publications. They would greatly benefit from an initial period dedicated to increasing core research skills and publications prior to proposing and seeking independent grant funds. In the long run, they will be more likely to succeed given the extended training since the PRIDE offers opportunities to collaborate with nationally known researchers and provides access to data resources and the possibility of increasing their publication record. Also, a small percentage of the slots may be reserved for repeat participation in structured manner that provides escalating levels of support.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea Treva Rice for the PRIDE (Programs to increase diversity among individuals engaged in health-related research): Joe GN “Skip” Garcia, Francisco Moreno Girardin Jean-Louis, Gbenga Ogedegbe, DC Rao, Victor Davila-Roman, Mohamed Boutjdir, Betty Pace, Juan Gonzales, Bettina M Beech, Keith Norris, Marino Bruce, Alicia Fernandez, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, and Margaret Handley.

Voting

5 net votes
11 up votes
6 down votes
Active

Goal 4: Develop Workforce and Resources

Preparing a Diverse Biomedical Technology Development Workforce

How do we best develop a scientific workforce that is fluent in product development and commercialization issues? How can NHLBI best expand the training opportunities for early career scientists to prepare them for entry into the dynamic biomedical workforce landscape? There is a need for scientifically-trained experts from diverse backgrounds who also understand business needs relevant to biomedical technology development,... more »

Is this idea a Compelling Question (CQ) or Critical Challenge (CC)? Compelling Question (CQ)

Details on the impact of addressing this CQ or CC

A well-trained biomedical technology development workforce would enhance the quantity and quality of research translated from the lab to the market focused on heart, lung, blood, sleep indications. A better understanding of the product development pathway would improve efficiency and resource usage, and accelerate the time for products to reach the market. Structured training would better prepare academic scientists for industry collaboration and provide an industry-ready scientific workforce. Ensuring these training opportunities are inclusive of scientists from different backgrounds would increase the diversity of the biomedical technology development workforce.

Feasibility and challenges of addressing this CQ or CC

Industry is a large employer of research trainees, and trainees are becoming increasingly vocal about their interest in opportunities to be trained in areas beyond the academic lab that would prepare them for roles in industry. NHLBI can leverage recently launched educational opportunities, including the BEST (Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training), NCAI (NIH Centers for Accelerated Innovations), REACH (Research Evaluation And Commercialization Hubs), and CTSA (Clinical and Translational Science Awards) programs.
Transitioning scientific discoveries to inventions and products to benefit public health requires knowledge and education beyond what is traditionally learned during medical, graduate, and post-doctoral training.

Challenges to addressing this CQ include:

• Need for educators and mentors with relevant industry experience and expertise.

• This would be a culture shift in academic institutions, though the new NIH programs described above has already started to influence this shift.

Name of idea submitter and other team members who worked on this idea NHLBI Staff

Voting

0 net votes
19 up votes
19 down votes
Active